-
Warwick - Evan provided open-source platform as a starting point, we don’t have to be fully on open-source (people update code as they wish), but this is something we can evaluate if this is ideal.
- Client’s starting point: We’re building out the framework to the platform so that people can use it to run their own food redistribution projects.
-
Lynn’s point re: legality: want to bring up legal aspect so we can narrow down the scope of the project.
- Open-source products - the legal ramifications would fall onto the individuals who use the platform, rather on the restaurants or the open-source product. Doesn’t mean we want to put out sth that’s not safe.
- Warwick: thinks that the open-source framework/platform to help individuals or communities make their food rdistribion system more efficient, that we will build will not have major legal risk as it is not a managed service, compared to a Saas product.
- Jennifer: legal research on the back burner,
-
North star goal: sth that we can mitigate food waste, but we don’t know who the users or problems we want to tackle yet. Client gave us a direction, but now we will need research to be clearer.
-
What’s the direction we want to go with?
- Secondary research: Where’s the most waste? Where’s the most need? What is the easiest approach to get this food redistribution system started?
-
Users:
- Indiduals and organizations who want to start a food redistribution site/system and mitigate food waste.
- Warwick: 3 main entities:
- Businesses
- Non-profits
- Individual consumers
- From this, we don’t want to provide a product to the biggest user group, rather, in this 0 to 1 product development, we want to solve a problem for a specific user group and create a personalized solution to them.
-
What’s Strategy assumption mapping today?
-
What are the constraints for this project?